These past few weeks I’ve been talking to a good friend of mine. We once shared a flat together. It was during our university studies. Who would have thought that our friendship would last so long.
At first it didn’t seem like a good idea to mix both topics. Now I’m not 100% convinced either, but he insisted. It seems that yesterday we agreed on the basic terms of his entry as an investor in what I’ve always called “the tool for investors” that from now on will be called “tool for Amazon”.
Since November we have had it active internally
The idea is to evolve towards a 3.0 version and to do so updated 2024 mobile phone number data start development from scratch again. With the experience we have, it’s not such a bad idea to go one step further.
We’re going to start development soon. We’ll do things right by signing a contract and those things that, even if we’re friends, making things clear helps.
My plan is the following
In 2024 we will develop the new tool. In 2025 we will start using it internally. In 2026 we will start selling it to external sellers. It will possibly be the most complete tool on the market. We are not going to replicate a Helium10. In fact, we are not going to focus so much on the niche market explain how measurable it is search part but rather on sellers who already have at least six-figure annual sales on Amazon looking to optimize everything they are doing. It will be a tool focused on operations and analytics.
Thanks to the injection of capital + development resources, we will be able gambler data to have a tool in good condition that we will also publish in three languages: German, English and Spanish.
While we are at it, we should also think about French and Italian. But well, everything will come.
So far, there are 12 reviews with an average of 3.5 stars
That’s what I would call a pretty bad average. Anything below 4.1 makes me feel uncomfortable. If a product starts with a rating of 3, there must be a fault. Personally, as a buyer, I wouldn’t touch a product with such a low average rating. I’ve already mentioned this recently, but it seems like a curious case to me, so I’ve detailed it a little more below.